Dear visitor (if there is any) please note the following: The blog "Broken Radius" is hosted at Google Blogger's server. I can therefore not guarantee that your visit to the blog or any comment you write wont be recorded by the NSA. If you have any worries about this, you can visit instead my alternative blog Letters-to-a-Persian-Cat. This one is hosted at a European server which hopefully acknowledges visitors privacy.


Intelligent Food Design

Hello Michael, So you think that posting photographs of food, half-eaten dishes from restaurants and so on blogs or FB (like I used to do) shows a lack of creativity, intellectual retardation and a developmental arrest at the oral stage ?  I have to admit, yes , I often post pictures of food to my PB pages, but usually they are either not yet touched (still in a perfect designed stage) or they are just decoration of a nice social company. You also had a recent picture with your colleagues in a restaurant, but this was either before you were served the food or you were there just drinking tea. 
I'd like to show you an example that pictures made during lunch not always have to do with a "..retardation at the oral developmental phase", but that they can also be the demonstration of a intellectual dispute. Today, for instance we had "baked Salmon with boiled potatoes and salad" for lunch in our institutes canteen. When I was about to dissect the fish on my plate I suddenly discovered that it did not contain any fish-bones !!!!  (see attached photo).

 In the concept of darwinian evolution, the appearance of the skeletton was a major leap. And as we all know, Fish were considered the first species belonging to the group of vertebrates.   
So how can it be that suddenly I catch an "invertebral salmon" on my plate ???  Could it be that this is a fake salmon, made by casting pangasius meat paste into a form that only looks
like a salmon ?

No, it is obvious, all vertrebrate fish are laboratory artifacts produced by pro-evolution scientist, whereas the one on my plate is a representative of natural fish.  Invertebrate Fish shows that darwinian evolution was never even a concept, but a product of a conspiracy.

Don't you think I'm right ?  
Take Care


  1. O my dear, what shall I say. It is hard to speak out, but I simply think that you are cheating !!! It has nothing to do with right or wrong, but with cheating or honesty.
    I always thought you are honest ?
    Devotedly, Michael

  2. Wow. I'm hard pressed to see if this was a serious e-mail or just two colleagues involved in an inside joke. I mean deboning a fish is such a basic culinary skill I can't believe that this would actually constitute an argument for intelligent design or evolutionary conspiracy. Perhaps I missed something? I'll have to consider it a joke because it made me laugh so hard when I read it. As for a "major leap" there are hundreds of thousands of invertebrate species who have done quite well without a backbone.

  3. Hi Just-a-peasant, it seems to be the sort of "evidence" that the people at the church of the flying spaghetti monster discuss. But you are right regarding the possibility to live without a backbone:And as we can see on an almost daily base, one can even do a political or administrative career without having any backbone.
    kind regards, Michael

    PS: Ghazal, could it be that the missing fishbone is here