I
knew the Rapoport family since I returned to East Berlin in 1988, to
start my PhD in a biomedical research center on the northern outskirts
of the city, in a suburban settlement known as Buch. It was not only
that Tom Rapoport was perhaps the youngest and most eminent professor
there, a scientist who started very early to work on the molecular
biology of the cell. What impressed me equally much was him insisting to
be simply called "Tom" by colleagues and students, a completely unusual
way of adressing a more senior scientist in the German academia,
otherwise notorious for its conservative and hierarchical structures.
I
remember very well one early New Years morning (it must have been in
1988 or 1989), when I did with a friend a skiing tour through the Czech
giant mountains, and we arrived pretty early for a 1st of January in a
shelter at the Medved peak. We were both pretty confident that we would
be the very first hikers in this year, and hurried to sign in our names
in the peak log-book. But we obviously underestimated the enhusiasm of
Tom Rapoport, who together with most of his young staff had been there
already one our before us.
In
the middle-class area of Berlin-Pankow, which after the German
reunification became one of the trendy parts of the capital to which the
Buch village belongs, the Rapoport family was also a gravity center of
intellectual and cultural ideas and discussions. To my parents, who
still live there, the Rapoports are more known as active and open-minded
neighbors with a social consciouness, as they were to me as scientists.
The more it was a big frustration to hear that after the Federal
Republic of Germany took over reponsibility of the Eastern research
authorities, a campaign was launched against Tom, trying to discredit
him of having benefitted from the political system of the socialist GDR.
It was obviously the attempt of a few employees of his institute to
justify their own mediocre scientific qualification, which became more
and more obvious following the long required international reviewing
process. Tom Rapoport, born in the US to Jewish emmigrants and being too
much a gentlemen to enter such a mudslinging, accepted a call from the
Howard Hughes Medical Institute in Boston to continue his research on
intracellular protein transport in the US. It was an irony of the
political ups and downs of the cold war period, that Tom had been member
of the ruling socialist unity party in the GDR, although he always
remained US citizen. Till today, neither the authorities of the German
research and education ministry nor the board of the Max-Delbrueck
Research center, predecessor of the Berlin-Buch institutes made any
attempt of a "Vergangenheitsbewaeltigung", an instrument in Germany to
deal with historical mistakes or disasters. Could it be that after a
period of 20 years a fatal political decision is still too present in
the mind of the actors involved, that their feeling of guilt is still
too fresh to enable them to reconsider without prejudies ? Another event
that involved Toms mother Ingeborg Rapoport could suggest this. With a
delay of 77 years Mrs. Rapoport, an eminent neonatologist recently was
granted her PhD title from the University of Hamburg, to which she
submitted her thesis in 1938. Her topic was diphtheria, an infectious
disease that was then a leading cause of death among children in the
U.S. and Europe.
The
German research community has to be grateful that this 102-year old
lady is still doing well enough to personally recieve her degree
certificate from the hands of the dean, and later celebrate with
friends, relatives and former coworkers this arisal of late justice.
- Ingeborg
Rapoport, 102, in the Berlin home where she has lived since 1952. In
march 2015 she qualified for a doctorate that she was refused in 1938.
In
1938, when Ms. Rapoport had completed her research project and
submitted her thesis, the Nazis under Adolf Hitler had just firmly
estblished their power in Germany. Ingeborg’s professor in Hamburg, a
one-time Nazi party member, praised her work, she recalled. But that
wasn’t enough. “I was told I wasn’t permitted to take the oral
examination,” she said.
Academic
authorities in Berlin cited “racial reasons” for the ban: Ms. Rapoport,
née Syllm, was raised as a Protestant, but her mother was Jewish,
making her “a first-degree crossbreed” in Nazi parlance. Officials
marked her exam forms with a telltale yellow stripe and deemed her
ineligible for academic advancement.
My
medical existence was turned to rubble,” said Ms. Rapoport. “It was a
shame for science and a shame for Germany.” Her treatment was hardly
unique: Thousands of “non-Aryan” students and professors were pushed out
of universities in Hitler’s Third Reich, and many died in death
camps.She and her family were spared that fate, though the University of
Hamburg fervidly embraced the new order. Its dean declared the school
“the first national-socialist institute of higher learning in the
Reich,” styling himself the university’s Führer-Rektor and setting up
new faculties of race biology and colonial law. Among the professors who
ran afoul of the Nazis was Ms. Rapoport’s professor, Rudolf Degkwitz,
whose expression of outrage over euthanasia at the children’s hospital,
among other dissents, led to his imprisonment. In 1938, Ms. Rapoport,
then named Ingeborg Syllm, emigrated penniless and alone to the U.S. She
did hospital internships in Brooklyn, N.Y., Baltimore and Akron, Ohio.
She applied to 48 medical schools and was accepted by one: the Women’s
Medical College of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.
“I had great luck—and perhaps some tenacity,” Ms. Rapoport said.
- Ingeborg Syllm, later Rapoport, as she looked shortly after she left Nazi Germany for the U.S. in 1938.
She
landed her first job as an M.D. at a Cincinnati hospital, where in 1944
she met an Austrian-Jewish physician and biochemist, Samuel Mitja
Rapoport, whom she married two years later. The couple flourished, as he
received a Certificate of Merit from President Harry S. Truman for his
work on blood conservation, and she rose quickly to head the hospital’s
pediatric polyclinic. The couple had three children in rapid succession.
The
original 1938 letter from Dr. Rapoport's professor saying she has
submitted a doctoral dissertation that would be acceptable ‘if the
current laws regarding Fräulein Syllm’s ancestry didn’t make it
impossible for her to be allowed to receive a doctorate.’
But
Mr. Rapoport was also getting unwanted attention from the government
because of his links to the Communist Party, which his wife came to
embrace as well. The two spent Sunday mornings distributing the Daily
Worker in depressed areas of Cincinnati. The Cincinnati Enquirer soon
got wind of that, and so did the House Un-American Activities Committee.
Feeling
the heat, Mr. Rapoport remained in Zurich after a pediatric conference
in 1950. Ms. Rapoport, pregnant with her fourth child, joined him in
Europe with their children. He unsuccessfully sought a position at his
alma mater, the University of Vienna, before the family moved to East
Germany.
 |
| The
original 1938 letter from Dr. Rapoport's professor saying she has
submitted a doctoral dissertation that would be acceptable ‘if the
current laws regarding Fräulein Syllm’s ancestry didn’t make it
impossible for her to be allowed to receive a doctorate.’ |
There
Mr. Rapoport got his own biochemical institute, remaining active almost
until his death in 2004. Ms. Rapoport founded the first neonatology
clinic in either Germany at Berlin’s Charité Hospital and their children
thrived in academic and medical careers of their own.
“I
have never felt bitterness,” she said. “I’ve been shockingly lucky in
all this. For me it all came out well: I had my best teachers in the
U.S., I found my husband, I had my children.” But still, she felt
wronged. Only in recent months did it begin looking possible that she
could receive the German doctorate she had been refused. A Hamburg
colleague of Ms. Rapoport’s son Tom, a Harvard Medical School professor,
told her story to the current dean of the University of Hamburg’s
medical faculty, who took up the cause.
‘I’ve
been shockingly lucky in all this. For me it all came out well: I had
my best teachers in the U.S., I found my husband, I had my children.’ (Ingeborg Rapoport)
The
dean, Dr. Uwe Koch-Gromus, soon realized that the bureaucratic
challenges weren’t minor. In March, the university’s legal department
said that for three reasons—her original paper couldn’t be found, she
had never completed her oral defense, and she had earned an M.D. from
the U.S. anyway—Ms. Rapoport should just be given an honorary degree.
Neither
Dr. Koch-Gromus nor Ms. Rapoport was content to plaster over the
injustice with an honorary doctorate; instead, he devised a legal
pathway for her to qualify for the real one she was denied, and Ms.
Rapoport started boning up.
Her
main practical obstacle has been her failing eyesight—she can’t read or
use a computer. So she had relatives and biochemist friends trawl the
Internet for the last seven decades of scientific advances in diphtheria
studies and report back by phone.
“I
know a lot more about diphtheria now than I did then,” said Ms.
Rapoport, who wrote in a 1997 memoir that her youthful devotion to
medicine was partly inspired by the Christian missionary Albert
Schweitzer.
On
Wednesday Dr. Koch-Gromus and two other professors settled into the
brown-and-orange furniture in Ms. Rapoport’s Berlin living room and
drilled her for 45 minutes before approving her doctorate—nearly eight
decades after she applied.
“It
was a very good test,” said the dean. “Frau Rapoport has gathered
notable knowledge about what’s happened since then. Particularly given
her age, she was brilliant.”
Ms.
Rapoport, though relieved, was less certain. “I used to always do my
best work in tests,” she said. “I’m afraid I don’t anymore.”
The
university has scheduled a ceremony in Hamburg on June 9, when Ms.
Rapoport will become, by all available evidence, the oldest person ever
to receive a doctoral degree. Guinness World Records has cited a
97-year-old German as the oldest recipient of a doctorate.
Dr. Koch-Gromus, Ms. Rapoport said, “has made a great effort to show that things are now different in Germany.”
But
the process has also brought her full circle. “Studying made me
remember how abandoned and uncertain I felt in 1938,” she said. “That
was covered up, but it’s come back recently in my dreams.”
